Skip to main content

Sunscreen

Being newly alert about health of my skin (see previous posts), and running low on my current supply of sunscreen, earlier today I emailed my dermatologist to ask for a recommendation of best brands of suncreen.

That included a note that Neutrogena will be a no-go for me, as a previous use of it resulted in a bad reaction to something in the ingredients.

I am currently using Bullfrog brand sunscreen, but will be happy to switch to the doctor's recommendation.

Comments

  1. @SDBBQAugust 22, 2018 at 3:28 PM

    Always a good idea. I need to do this more. I try, but fail most of the time to remember. It's not part of my normal morning routine -- which it should be.
    Hard to change that muscle memory.

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownAugust 23, 2018 at 6:11 AM

    I am reminded to note the doctor did reply. First. if one gets bad skin reactions to regular sunscreens, she recommended brands Blue Lizard or Vanicream. But otherwise, she wrote that any brand that is at least SPF 30 and broad spectrum (covers both UV-A and UV-B) will be fine.

    So, I will just stick with the previously mentioned Bullfrog brand, which is SPF 50 and broad spectrum. But one should definitely note the intended uses; for instance Bullfrog has three varieties of sunscreen gels: One that is combined with DEET for use where mosquitoes are present, one for use in water, and one for other uses on land.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hoo boy. The medical fun just goes on and on.

Have seen the dermatologist I had mentioned earlier. The two most serious items I was concerned with, the growth on an outer ear, and what I have been thinking of as an "age spot" on my neck were both tentatively identified by eyeball examination as cancerous. She said the growth appeared to be squamous cell, and the spot appeared to be non-aggressive melanoma. (Big sigh.) She also identified two much smaller points as being of concern, and took biopsy samples of all four, which included full removal of all. The pathology department should get back to her in one to two weeks with analysis, and obviously we would go from there. She had me make an appointment for another general check in 3 months. In the meantime I have instructions on care for the biopsy sites. Obviously I need to apply myself to better sun screening practices! One more thing: DO NOT do Google image searches for "squamous cell" and "melanoma," as I just did. O.M.G.
1 comment
Read more

Biopsy wounds update

It's hard to visually discern with it being on one side of my neck and below the ear, but I realized the biopsy wound for the hopefully non-agressive melanoma actually is healing quite nicely. So I am wearing no bandages while at work, but will for a while yet wear a couple during sleeping just to be safe.
1 comment
Read more

Dermatology biopsy wounds

About the biopsies the dermatologist took last Friday: Expecting the pathology department analysis results anytime from this Friday on. But the wound for the doctor tenatively identified as a non-agressive melanoma is going to be taking quite a while to fully heal up, as that site is roughly the size of my thumb print. But at least the other three biopsy wounds are healing nicely. I'm still wearing a bandage for the one on an outer ear; I'm surprised there have been no comments on that at work, but I guess everyone is just being polite.
1 comment
Read more